International Journal of Humanities and Social Science

      ISSN 2220-8488 (Print), 2221-0989 (Online)

      Call for Papers

      The Brooklyn Research and Publishing Institute (BRPI) invites academics, scholars, researchers, and professionals from around the world to submit their manuscripts for publication in our wide range of highly esteemed peer-reviewed academic journals.

      Read more...

      Recruitment of Reviewers

      The Brooklyn Research and Publishing Institute (BRPI), a distinguished international publisher of open-access academic journals, is currently inviting qualified scholars to join its esteemed pool of peer reviewers.

      Read more...

      Article Icon Article Information
      Original Research Article | Open Access | Peer Reviewed update icon Check for updates

      Reforming Rescue: A Critical Examination of India's Anti-Trafficking Legislation from a Victim-Centered Perspective

      Devarya Grover Email
      Abstract This article interrogates the legal and linguistic design of India's anti-human trafficking legislation to query whether it is, in fact, victim-centered or rhetorically reformist. Indian Bills of 2021, 2022, and 2023, for example, invoke themes of "comprehensive victim care" but fail to include assurances of enforcement, budgetary allocations, or survivor-driven accountability. The central lacuna this study fills is not if India's laws use the rhetoric of victim protection, but how such rhetoric may cloak coercive state power, moral control, and institutional neglect. Methodologically, the research adopts a qualitative, document-based approach within Alan Bryman's interpretive paradigm. Through the thematic analysis of five key legislative and parliamentary documents, such as the 2013 Lok Sabha Committee Report and anti-trafficking Bills currently under consideration, the research takes into account both what is stated and what is legally or morally implied. In doing so, it allows for an analysis of the ways in which victimhood, agency, and rehabilitation are legal constructions under a bureaucratic and often carceral rationale. Rather than itemizing legal provisions, the focus is on how legal discourse expresses political will, structural silences, and contested visions of care and control. Ultimately, the paper argues that while India's laws mirror international rhetoric, they fall short in operationalizing survivor agency. Comparative reflections with international models and deeper participatory reform remain critical to bridging the gap between symbolic rights and institutional practice.
      Article History:
      21 June 2025 | Accepted: 10 July 2025 | Published: 24 July 2025
      Reviewer(s): Dr. Stilia Felisi, St. Kliment Ohridski University of Sofia, Bulgaria; ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4784-0611; Phone: +359 878 606646
      Email: [email protected]
      Dr. Olaleye Yetunde, University of Westminster, London, UK; ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4617-6625; Phone: +44 7881 184805.
      Email: [email protected]
      Address for Correspondence: Devarya Grover, 1 Rhu Cross, Tanjong Rhu Road, Costa Rhu, Singapore 437431, +65 9830 3053.
      [email protected]
      Cite this article:
      APA | MLA | Chicago | Harvard | Vancouver
      Article Metrics (Citations):
      For the most up-to-date citation information for this article, please refer to Google Scholar.

      Note: Citation statistics will only be available once the article is indexed in Google Scholar.

      主站蜘蛛池模板: 波多野结衣种子网盘| 欧美精品www| 成年女性特黄午夜视频免费看| 亚洲欧洲精品成人久久曰| 精品国产欧美精品v| 国产大秀视频一区二区三区| 亚洲明星合成图综合区在线| 色天使色婷婷丁香久久综合| 国产精品99精品久久免费| gay在线看www| 新版bt天堂资源在线| 亚洲AV日韩AV永久无码下载| 波多野结衣在线观看一区| 可播放的免费男男videos不卡| 99热国产在线观看| 放荡的欲乱合集| 亚洲AV成人片色在线观看高潮| 热re99久久精品国产99热| 囯产精品一品二区三区| 黑人巨鞭大战中国妇女| 国产精品福利影院| baoyu122.永久免费视频| 成年午夜性视频| 久久国产高潮流白浆免费观看 | 欧美视频在线网站| 免费高清日本1在线观看| 色综合天天综合网站中国| 国产日韩视频在线| 884hutv四虎永久黄网| 天海翼电影在线观看| 亚洲午夜国产精品| 狠狠久久永久免费观看| 听了下面湿透的娇喘音频| 青青青视频免费| 国产熟睡乱子伦视频观看软件| 中文国产成人精品久久96| 日韩高清在线播放| 亚洲欧美日本a∨在线观看| 被吃奶跟添下面视频| 国产欧美综合一区二区三区| 91亚洲国产成人久久精品网站|