International Journal of Humanities and Social Science

      ISSN 2220-8488 (Print), 2221-0989 (Online) 10.30845/ijhss

      Call for Papers

      The Brooklyn Research and Publishing Institute (BRPI) invites academics, scholars, researchers, and professionals from around the world to submit their manuscripts for publication in our wide range of highly esteemed peer-reviewed academic journals.

      Read more...

      Recruitment of Reviewers

      The Brooklyn Research and Publishing Institute (BRPI), a distinguished international publisher of open-access academic journals, is currently inviting qualified scholars to join its esteemed pool of peer reviewers.

      Read more...

      Could Andreas Vesalius Have Drawn the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament in De Humani Corporis Fabrica (1543)?
      Wander Edney de Brito, Rui Barbosa de Brito, Marcelo Henrique Napimoga

      Abstract
      The Vesalius’s drawings are known for the richness in detail which was produced in 1543. Revisiting the drawings, we suggest that the medial patellofemoral ligament may have already been represented at that time. For many centuries, once upon a time, the internal human anatomy could only be appreciated serendipitously, be it by glancing at skeletal remains from raided cemetery tombsor when the thoracic-abdominal viscera were exposed either in battle or when corpses were prepared for mummification. Deliberate opening of a human body to examine its content, however, violated all legal and culturally acceptable limits and was strictly forbidden (Standring et al., 2016). Before the Renaissance, knowledge on human anatomy was based on animal dissection, which was then extrapolated to humans by approximation. Early in the Renaissance, studies involving human cadavers were authorized, which propelled an exponential development in this field, the results of which are still seen today. Andreas Vesalius, Belgian doctor, is regarded as the father of modern anatomy due to his masterpiece De Humani Corporis Fabrica (1543) (Mesquita et al., 2015), and some of his human anatomy drawings display an incredible wealth of detail even when compared to contemporaneous anatomy text books. Findings or classifications in the area of the patellofemoral joint are sadly complicated by a lack of consensus on nomenclature, causing a great deal of confusion amongst different readers, which could easily be resolved should the scientific and medical communities be able to a green a single definition of terms (Grelsamer, 2005). In 2013, an article described a socalled novel ligament within the anterolateral joint of the knee in humans, which gained much media coverage worldwide (Claes et al., 2013). Interestingly, in 1879, a French surgeon named Segond had already scrutinized the anatomical landmarks in this region (Cavaignac et al., 2016). Nowadays, the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is regarded as a primary restrictor of medialization forces to the patella. It was first described as a structure in layer II on the medial aspect of the knee (Marshall & Warren, 1979). The MPFL is a 53-mm longand thin fascial band attached in to medial femoral epicondyle and the medial border of the patella (Amis et al., 2003).A subsequent study suggested, however, that such ligament was present only in 35% of analyzed individuals (Reider et al., 1981) though most recent studies have demonstrated that this prevalence could be as high as 100% (Steensen et al., 2004). The MPFL is also considered a crucial structure for medial patellar stability and, therefore, reconstructive surgery is highly regarded in the treatment of patellofemoral dislocation (Hautamaa et al., 1998). How novel can a ligament discovery actually be? Could anatomists from centuries ago have seen it all before? Are we re-inventing the wheel? By revisiting the illustrations in De Humani Corporis Fabrica (1543) by Andreas Vesalius, one is able to see the MPFL depicted on the medial aspect of the knee, with its femoral and patellar insertions, though the author sadly failed to give it a name. Figure 1A represents a superficial anatomy view of the knee showing very clearly the MPFL on the right side of the picture(Figure 1B, arrow). Detailed drawings described therein surpassed any previous representations of the dissected human body and are arguably the most important of all illustrations in the history of medical science. The process of planning, designing, outlining and executing is one of the most remarkable in the history of anatomy illustration art (Kemp, 1970). The work by Andreas Vesalius in De Humani Corporis Fabrica far exceeds expectations in terms of quality, especially taking into account the historical period in which it was conceived (1543). Vesalius’ drawing precision was exquisite and, in our view, the detail with which the MPFL was illustrated is frankly outstanding. Perhaps a shadow produced by the vast us medial is oblique muscle? We do not think so. We believe that this and other anatomy geniuses have yet more surprises in store awaiting those willing to investigate them.

      Full Text: PDF

      主站蜘蛛池模板: 69精品久久久久| 久久久无码一区二区三区| 美国一级毛片免费看| 国产精品无码2021在线观看| 中文字幕一区二区三匹| 樱花草视频www| 人人狠狠综合久久亚洲| 色视频综合无码一区二区三区| 国产精品永久免费自在线观看| 一本大道AV伊人久久综合| 日韩一级在线播放免费观看| 亚洲最大成人网色| 精品国产综合区久久久久久| 国产在线观看首页123| 67194国产精品免费观看| 巨龙征母全文王雪琴笔趣阁 | h在线免费视频| 欧美熟妇另类久久久久久不卡 | 国产在线观看免费视频软件| 91www永久在线精品果冻传媒| 小h片在线观看| 久久亚洲欧美日本精品| 欧美三级一级片| 亚洲精品国产专区91在线| 精品无码久久久久久尤物| 国产农村乱子伦精品视频| 天堂久久久久久中文字幕| 在线观看的黄网| 一本一道久久综合久久| 日日碰狠狠添天天爽超碰97| 亚洲av无码一区二区三区dv| 污污视频网站免费| 免费观看男人免费桶女人视频| 5╳社区视频在线5sq| 少妇人妻偷人精品一区二区| 久久国产成人精品国产成人亚洲| 欧美亚洲综合在线| 亚洲精品国产日韩| 真正国产乱子伦高清对白| 四虎影院永久在线| 香蕉视频软件app下载|