International Journal of Humanities and Social Science

      ISSN 2220-8488 (Print), 2221-0989 (Online) 10.30845/ijhss

      Call for Papers

      The Brooklyn Research and Publishing Institute (BRPI) invites academics, scholars, researchers, and professionals from around the world to submit their manuscripts for publication in our wide range of highly esteemed peer-reviewed academic journals.

      Read more...

      Recruitment of Reviewers

      The Brooklyn Research and Publishing Institute (BRPI), a distinguished international publisher of open-access academic journals, is currently inviting qualified scholars to join its esteemed pool of peer reviewers.

      Read more...

      Post-apartheid South Africa and Patterns of Violence in J.M. Coetzee’s Disgrace and Phaswane Mpe’s Welcome to Our Hillbrow
      Dr. Gilbert Tarka Fai

      Abstract
      J.M. Coetzee and Phaswane Mpe are among the first South African writers to bring global attention to the condition of South Africa after apartheid. In Disgrace and Welcome to Our Hillbrow, the two writers highlight the overwhelming internal pressures exerted on the new South African society by centuries of apartheid and the wider legacy of colonialism, just as they explore the volatile explosive history of the post-apartheid era wherein total anarchy has replaced the old oppressive racist forces. The objective of this paper is to demonstrate that J.M. Coetzee and Phaswane Mpe in Disgrace and Welcome to Our Hillbrow respectively try to rectify the popular misconception of a post-apartheid South African nation as an Eldorado or sanctuary as implied by the new dispensation of 1994. This is understandable from the opinions of Ernest Renan (1990), Benedict Anderson (1983), Kevin Harrison, Tony Boyd and Seton-Watson (2003) about the nation as a perception that is more imaginary than real. In this regard, the prospect of a “new South African nation” after the end of apartheid would be more of a vision than a fact. Therefore, the frustrations of Coetzee and Mpe’s characters manifested through different forms of violence result from their misconstrued dreams and expectations. R.K. Merton’s Strain theory (2002) also clearly points out that people brought up in a society that predisposes them to various forms of strain whether political, economic, social or psychological leave them with no option but to embrace a subculture of violence. Coetzee and Mpe consequently view post-apartheid violence in South Africa not only as a result of political shortcomings but also of historical, economic, social, geographical and global circumstances since political change alone cannot magically transform the plight of a country caught in the chaotic aftermath of centuries of racial oppression. The study concludes that for Coetzee and Mpe, the hope of a post-apartheid South Africa that is free, just and prosperous lies in a gradual ensemble of efforts furnished by both South African and non-South African citizens in a global context because any egocentric or precipitated drive for instantaneous solutions only generates violence as demonstrated by the characters in the novels under study.

      Full Text: PDF

      主站蜘蛛池模板: 乳揉みま痴汉电车动漫中文字幕| 大ji巴cao死你高h男男gg| 亚洲欧美精品一区天堂久久| 色窝窝亚洲AV网在线观看| 国产精品老熟女露脸视频| 三级韩国一区久久二区综合| 波多野结衣制服诱惑| 国产99视频精品免视看9| 性一交一乱一伧老太| 天天做天天爱夜夜爽毛片毛片| 久久久久久夜精品精品免费啦| 欧美影院在线观看| 国产免费丝袜调教视频| 91精品久久久久久久久网影视| 成年在线网站免费观看无广告| 亚1州区2区三区4区产品| 毛片基地免费视频a| 国产成a人片在线观看视频下载| 99精品国产99久久久久久97| 成人片黄网站色大片免费| 九九全国免费视频| 欧美毛多水多肥妇| 俄罗斯大荫蒂女人毛茸茸| 色一情一乱一伦一区二区三欧美| 在线观看日本中文字幕| 中文字幕在线视频一区| 日韩精品免费一线在线观看| 亚洲成av人片在线观看无码| 男女一边摸一边做爽爽| 国产无遮挡又黄又爽在线观看| 99免费在线视频| 性欧美丰满熟妇XXXX性久久久| 久久国产成人精品| 欧美18性精品| 全球全球gogo专业摄影| 蜜柚直播在线播放| 国内精品国产成人国产三级| 一本久到久久亚洲综合| 日本一卡精品视频免费| 亚洲第一网站男人都懂| 精品国产一区二区三区不卡|